<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Thoughts on Voice in Second Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cc-chapman.com/2007/06/20/first-thoughts-on-voice-in-second-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cc-chapman.com/2007/06/20/first-thoughts-on-voice-in-second-life/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, Rambles and Inspirations from C.C. Chapman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:25:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jersey Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.cc-chapman.com/2007/06/20/first-thoughts-on-voice-in-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-43522</link>
		<dc:creator>Jersey Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cc-chapman.com/2007/06/20/first-thoughts-on-voice-in-second-life/#comment-43522</guid>
		<description>In regard to taping the conversations, I&#039;d bet that the traditional laws would indeed apply, for now. 

However, if pressed, it really comes down to whether a Court will believe that there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in SL. Ultimately, it is unlikely that any Court would believe that there is. 

But for now, I&#039;d hold off taping someone without their knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regard to taping the conversations, I&#8217;d bet that the traditional laws would indeed apply, for now. </p>
<p>However, if pressed, it really comes down to whether a Court will believe that there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in SL. Ultimately, it is unlikely that any Court would believe that there is. </p>
<p>But for now, I&#8217;d hold off taping someone without their knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Amphlett</title>
		<link>http://www.cc-chapman.com/2007/06/20/first-thoughts-on-voice-in-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-43521</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Amphlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cc-chapman.com/2007/06/20/first-thoughts-on-voice-in-second-life/#comment-43521</guid>
		<description>You aluded to how typing/reading holds your attention in-world but voice allows your eyes and fingers to wonder. This is true, but the things you&#039;re wondering onto are PC based - email, browsing etc. Personally I love the idea of the immersion becoming deeper - let SL be the operating system. Everything you want to do on your PC should have an in-world equivalent. Well at the very least the most common things. Email readers, web-browsers, rss-aggregators. If Linden Labs would just sort out html rendering on a surface, all of this stuff will be possible. Of course if they made the scripting language a little more flexible it would not just be possible but relatively easy. That&#039;s when I think SL would take a massive step forward. It would become a platform in it&#039;s own right. Imagine for example, taking rezzing your web-browser &#039;panel&#039; and stretching it to a couple of meters square and showing some other people a new website you&#039;ve found. Or having an inbox on your own table that&#039;s hooked up to your email, taking the messages out and them unfolding inworld into emails you can read (ok there&#039;s privacy issues). Or how about rezzing your podcast recorder device and recording a podcast inworld, then getting the device to upload it automatically to the web. I just love the vision of SL as a platform and am so frustrated that I can&#039;t make it happen just because there&#039;s no way to programatically write to a surface !!! When Linden finally get round to it, SL will become a platform for software deployment, just like the PC was and the web is now. Anyway - going to have to try the voice soon too - In-world I&#039;m an English Gentleman - in RL I&#039;m not that far off ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You aluded to how typing/reading holds your attention in-world but voice allows your eyes and fingers to wonder. This is true, but the things you&#8217;re wondering onto are PC based &#8211; email, browsing etc. Personally I love the idea of the immersion becoming deeper &#8211; let SL be the operating system. Everything you want to do on your PC should have an in-world equivalent. Well at the very least the most common things. Email readers, web-browsers, rss-aggregators. If Linden Labs would just sort out html rendering on a surface, all of this stuff will be possible. Of course if they made the scripting language a little more flexible it would not just be possible but relatively easy. That&#8217;s when I think SL would take a massive step forward. It would become a platform in it&#8217;s own right. Imagine for example, taking rezzing your web-browser &#8216;panel&#8217; and stretching it to a couple of meters square and showing some other people a new website you&#8217;ve found. Or having an inbox on your own table that&#8217;s hooked up to your email, taking the messages out and them unfolding inworld into emails you can read (ok there&#8217;s privacy issues). Or how about rezzing your podcast recorder device and recording a podcast inworld, then getting the device to upload it automatically to the web. I just love the vision of SL as a platform and am so frustrated that I can&#8217;t make it happen just because there&#8217;s no way to programatically write to a surface !!! When Linden finally get round to it, SL will become a platform for software deployment, just like the PC was and the web is now. Anyway &#8211; going to have to try the voice soon too &#8211; In-world I&#8217;m an English Gentleman &#8211; in RL I&#8217;m not that far off <img src='http://www.cc-chapman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techno//Marketer</title>
		<link>http://www.cc-chapman.com/2007/06/20/first-thoughts-on-voice-in-second-life/comment-page-1/#comment-43520</link>
		<dc:creator>Techno//Marketer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cc-chapman.com/2007/06/20/first-thoughts-on-voice-in-second-life/#comment-43520</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Second Life for marketers...&lt;/strong&gt;

Any time I bring up Second Life when I am speaking or talking to clients I get this look like &quot;What the hell are you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Second Life for marketers&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Any time I bring up Second Life when I am speaking or talking to clients I get this look like &#8220;What the hell are you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.495 seconds -->
